|
|
|
Daniel Bromilow B.A.
Click here for printable version
Daniel Bromilow studied law at Robinson College, Cambridge and joined Chambers after completing pupillage, having been called to the Bar in November 1996.
He has a wide-ranging practice covering most areas of Chancery and general civil/commercial work, but specialises in real property, landlord and tenant, wills, trusts and company and insolvency law.
Recent cases:
- Wilkinson v. Healey, Guildford County Court [2007] - (boundary dispute involving removal of mature conifers involving, in particular, argument as to the proper quantum of loss)
- Ditta & Woods v. McBarnett & McBarnett, Reading County Court [2006] - (claim based in proprietary estoppel and constructive trust arising out of a promise to sell a house to a family member)
- Castellan Group v. Crewe Engines, Arbitration [2006] - (claim relating to alleged poor workmanship in the rebuilding of a vintage Mercedes car engine)
- Maw v. Wheatley, Milton Keynes County Court [2006] - (claim by tenants seeking repayment of service charges under section 20B of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985)
- Crichel Estates v. Metcalf, Southampton County Court [2006] - (claim by landlord for possession of a house let on a 20 year protected tenancy by virtue of the tenant's failure to repair)
- Hastings Borough Council v. Ravenclaw, Hastings Magistrates Court [2006] - (application by local authority for an order under section 77 of the Building Act 1984 to close Hastings Pier on the basis that it was unsafe)
- Watson v. Ravenclaw, Chancery Division [2006] - (application by tenants of commercial units on Hastings Pier to restrain their landlord from preventing them gaining access to their premises)
- Payne v. Payne, Central London County Court [2006] - (claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependents) Act 1975 by an adult child)
- Cinquini v. Gallone, Chancery Division [2006] - (claim by shareholder in family firm seeking to challenge the appointment of a new director on the grounds of procedural irregularities)
- Qualys v. Digi-Sign, Chancery Division [2005] - (application to restrain advertisement of a winding up petition on the basis that the petitioner was not a creditor of the company)
- Creaby & Dardis v. Saunders Bearman, Central London County Court [2005] - (claim by prospective purchasers of a property for repayment of monies held on account by the vendors' solicitors pursuant to an abortive exclusivity agreement)
- Brockhall Village Ltd v. Berg, Newcastle County Court [2005] - (a claim concerning the effect of section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 on a partially-completed sale of land)
- Callcott Holdings v. Tandon, Leasehold Valuation Tribunal [2005] - (claim by tenant that service charges on residential flat were unreasonable)
- Tangye v. Ap'Simon, Chancery Division [2005] - (extent to which executor was entitled to recover his expenses incurred in the administration of the estate and to which he was entitled to charge for his time)
- Bell v. Bell, Chancery Division [2005] - (application for freezing order in order to secure assets misappropriated by an executor)
- Roche & Co v. Puvanesan, Mayor's and City County Court [2005] - (liability of former employee of a firm of solicitors to account for fees on the basis of wilful default)
- Shinn v. Baines, Luton County Court [2004] - (claim involving an allegedly defective F1 Stock car race engine)
Reported cases:
- Stamp v. Tibbs, [2004] All ER (D) 182 (Nov) - (claim by land agent for a share of the proceeds of a profitable land transaction)
- re Wylde (2006) 1 WLR 2674 - (liability for costs of Claimants in a contested probate claim who discontinued their claim, in which they alleged that a Will was invalid)
View Decision
- Slamon v. Planchon [2005] Ch 142 - (resident landlord exception in the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 following the amendments introduced by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002)
View Decision
- Montgomery v. Wanda Modes Ltd (2002) 1 BCLC 289 - (relevance of counterclaims and cross-claims in a disputed winding up petition)
- St. Albans Court v. Daldorch Estates, Times, 24 May 1999 - (procedural aspects of a claim against directors of a company alleging breach of fiduciary duties)
View Decision
When not working, Daniel spends most of his spare time either playing with cars or mountain-biking.
Click here for printable version
Return to members list
|
