9 Stone Buildings, Lincoln's Inn, London, WC2A 3NN, United Kingdom
nine stone buildings barristers in these chambers undertake advocacy, drafting and advice in a wide range of equity, property, commercial and financial matters both at home and overseas. instructions are accepted not only from solicitors entitled to practise in england and wales but from foreign lawyers and from professionals approved by the bar council for direct access to counsel
9 Stone Buildings - telephone +44 (0)20 7404 5055 - holders of the Quality Mark for the Bar
Home Page
Barristers
Christopher Cant
Vivian Chapman QC
Michael Ashe QC SC
Isaac Jacob
David Rowell
Robert Bourne
Edward Denehan
Martin Young
Lynne Counsell
Sheila Foley
Charles Holbech
Timothy Sisley
John Smart
Philip Flower
Helene Pines Richman
Lana Wood
Peter Shaw
Daniel Bromilow
Stephen Arthur
Elaine Palser
Jonathan O'Mahony
Joseph Curl
Edward Hewitt
Conn MacEvilly

Overseas members

Nicholas Critelli (USA)
James Levy QC (Gibraltar)
Anthony Provasoli (Gibraltar)
Dr Raymond Ashton (Guernsey)

Door tenant

Marc Beaumont

Administration
Expertise
History
Publications
Recruitment
Pupillage
News and events
Seminars
Contact Us
Feedback
Links
ranked in chambers and partners
Daniel Bromilow B.A.

Click here for printable version

Daniel Bromilow Daniel Bromilow studied law at Robinson College, Cambridge and joined Chambers after completing pupillage, having been called to the Bar in November 1996.

He has a wide-ranging practice covering most areas of Chancery and general civil/commercial work, but specialises in real property, landlord and tenant, wills, trusts and company and insolvency law.

Reported cases:
  • Harbour Estates Ltd v. Charania [2009] EWCA Civ 1123 - (Court of Appeal decision on the recovery of commission by estate agents in light of the decision in Foxtons Ltd v. Pelkey Bicknell)
  • Stimpson v. Southern Private Landlords Association [2009] EWHC 2072 (Ch) - (application for permission to bring proceedings in the name of a company)
  • Piper v. Wakeford [2008] EWCA Civ 1378 - (Court of Appeal decision on a boundary dispute case concerning the admissibility and relevance of extrinsic evidence in light of the decision in Ali v. Lane) View Decision
  • Shah v. Colvia Management Co Ltd [2007] EWHC 3343 (Ch) - (case regarding the reasonableness of parking regluations proposed to be introduced at a mixed-use industrial estate) View Decision
  • re Wylde (2006) 1 WLR 2674 - (liability for costs of Claimants in a contested probate claim who discontinued their claim, in which they alleged that a Will was invalid) View Decision
  • Slamon v. Planchon [2005] Ch 142 - (resident landlord exception in the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 following the amendments introduced by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002) View Decision
  • Stamp v. Tibbs, [2004] All ER (D) 182 (Nov) - (claim by land agent for a share of the proceeds of a profitable land transaction)
  • Montgomery v. Wanda Modes Ltd (2002) 1 BCLC 289 - (relevance of counterclaims and cross-claims in a disputed winding up petition)
  • St. Albans Court v. Daldorch Estates, Times, 24 May 1999 - (procedural aspects of a claim against directors of a company alleging breach of fiduciary duties) View Decision
Recent cases:
  • Khan v. Saunders [2009], Croydon County Court - (claim by a husband on the basis that his wife had forged his signature on documents giving effect to a sale and leaseback agreement against the successor in title to the original purchaser)
  • Basson v. Hewson [2009], Mayor's & City of London County Court - (wide-ranging claim involving allegations of interference with drainage easements, nuisance, breaches of the Party Walls etc. Act 1996 and the obligation of a landowner to maintain a right of way)
  • Avoncrest v. Goodview [2009], Leasehold Valuation Tribunal - (determination of a tenant's liability to pay service charges turning on the proper interpretation of the relevant provisions of the lease with regard to the maintenance of party walls)
  • Streeter v. Streeter [2009], Chancery Division - (application by executor for directions regarding the implementation of a Tomlin Order and in particular for directions regarding the incidence of costs)
  • Ely Grange Management Ltd v. Coe [2009], Tunbridge Wells County Court - (claim by a management company for sewage treatment charges brought in restitution on grounds of free acceptance of services)
  • Grosvenor Pines Freehold Ltd v. Gates [2009], Southern LVT - (application for determination of the terms of acquisition in a collective enfranchisement claim and, in particular, whether or not restrictive covenants sought to be included by the freeholder should be incorporated into the transfer)
  • Le Maitre Ltd v. Thomas, Chancery Division [2008] - (successful application for search order following an unlawful attempt by a former employee to sell his former employer's confidential information)
  • Brock v. Packamist Ltd, Leasehold Valuation Tribunal [2008] - (acting for a landlord in relation to a claim by tenants that service charges were unreasonable. Of the eleven items challenged, the tenants succeeded only partially on one) View Decision
  • Cantrell v. Carpenter, Luton County Court [2008] - (a claim seeking a declaration that the grant of an easement was ineffective as conferring no practical benefit on the dominant tenement and/or that interference with the right of way was not actionable as it did not amount substantial interference)
  • Wasu v. Royal Bank of Scotland, Watford County Court [2008] - (successful application for pre-action disclosure against the Royal Bank of Scotland)
  • Harbour Estate Ltd v. Charania, Central London County Court [2008] - (acted for a firm of estate agents in a claim for payment of commission, unsuccessfully resisted by the vendor on the basis that the estate agents had not introduced the purchaser to the transaction)
  • Bowler v. Munir, Chancery Division [2008] - (successful application for a freezing order preventing the Respondent from disposing of a Bentley Continental GT car owned by the Applicant)
  • Doyle v. Doyle, Chancery Division [2008] - (successful application to strike out a claim alleging breaches of trust and seeking the removal and replacement of trustees)
  • Paul Helps Landscaping Ltd v. Scriven, Yeovil County Court [2008] - (successful claim by a builder for payment of outstanding sums owed to him)
  • Wilkinson v. Healey, Guildford County Court [2007] - (boundary dispute involving removal of mature conifers involving, in particular, argument as to the proper quantum of loss)
  • Ditta & Woods v. McBarnett & McBarnett, Reading County Court [2006] - (claim based in proprietary estoppel and constructive trust arising out of a promise to sell a house to a family member)
  • Castellan Group v. Crewe Engines, Arbitration [2006] - (claim relating to alleged poor workmanship in the rebuilding of a vintage Mercedes car engine)
  • Maw v. Wheatley, Milton Keynes County Court [2006] - (claim by tenants seeking repayment of service charges under section 20B of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985)
  • Crichel Estates v. Metcalf, Southampton County Court [2006] - (claim by landlord for possession of a house let on a 20 year protected tenancy by virtue of the tenant's failure to repair)
  • Hastings Borough Council v. Ravenclaw, Hastings Magistrates Court [2006] - (application by local authority for an order under section 77 of the Building Act 1984 to close Hastings Pier on the basis that it was unsafe)
  • Watson v. Ravenclaw, Chancery Division [2006] - (application by tenants of commercial units on Hastings Pier to restrain their landlord from preventing them gaining access to their premises)
  • Payne v. Payne, Central London County Court [2006] - (claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependents) Act 1975 by an adult child)
  • Cinquini v. Gallone, Chancery Division [2006] - (claim by shareholder in family firm seeking to challenge the appointment of a new director on the grounds of procedural irregularities)
  • Qualys v. Digi-Sign, Chancery Division [2005] - (application to restrain advertisement of a winding up petition on the basis that the petitioner was not a creditor of the company)
  • Creaby & Dardis v. Saunders Bearman, Central London County Court [2005] - (claim by prospective purchasers of a property for repayment of monies held on account by the vendors' solicitors pursuant to an abortive exclusivity agreement)
  • Brockhall Village Ltd v. Berg, Newcastle County Court [2005] - (a claim concerning the effect of section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 on a partially-completed sale of land)
  • Callcott Holdings v. Tandon, Leasehold Valuation Tribunal [2005] - (claim by tenant that service charges on residential flat were unreasonable)
  • Tangye v. Ap'Simon, Chancery Division [2005] - (extent to which executor was entitled to recover his expenses incurred in the administration of the estate and to which he was entitled to charge for his time)
  • Bell v. Bell, Chancery Division [2005] - (application for freezing order in order to secure assets misappropriated by an executor)
  • Roche & Co v. Puvanesan, Mayor's and City County Court [2005] - (liability of former employee of a firm of solicitors to account for fees on the basis of wilful default)
  • Shinn v. Baines, Luton County Court [2004] - (claim involving an allegedly defective F1 Stock car race engine)
When not working, Daniel spends most of his spare time either playing with cars or mountain-biking.

Click here for printable version

9 Stone Buildings, London first class service to its domestic and overseas clientele all aspects of the law relating to land and property, private client all aspects of the law relating to companies, personal and corporate insolvency all aspects of the law relating to finance, business and commerce
  Tel: +44(0)20 7404 5055     Fax: +44(0)20 7405 1551© 2009 9 Stone Buildings  
:: home :: members :: expertise :: administration :: client care :: continuing professional development :: history :: publications ::
:: pupillage :: recruitment :: news and events :: seminars :: contact us :: feedback :: links ::