Joseph Curl


Joseph Curl specialises in commercial Chancery, with the emphasis on insolvency.

He is ranked as a leading junior in both the major legal directories.

Chambers UK Bar 2017 and Chambers Global 2017 says:

“He’s clever, commercial and reliable.”

Legal 500 2016 says that he is:

“A superb advocate, who is very knowledgeable on the law and adept at thinking on his feet”

See More...See Less...

Chambers UK Bar 2016 says:

“A highly regarded junior who acts on behalf of sizeable lenders and pre-eminent insolvency practitioners in insolvency litigation.

Strengths: ‘He is excellent in court, particularly when required to think on his feet and his written submissions are also first class. He is also instinctively able to see the commercial implications of every twist and turn in a piece of litigation.’”

Legal 500 2015 described him as:

“…very responsive, easy to work with, and a tenacious litigator.”

Chambers UK 2015 notes he has:

“…developed a strong reputation as a technically adept and client-friendly junior…a good all-rounder, who provides excellent advice and presents very well on his feet…

Expertise: ‘He provides advice in an extremely unstuffy manner, and has extremely good insolvency expertise.’ ‘He is clever, commercial and reliable.’”

Chambers UK 2014 described him as:

“A busy junior with a growing reputation in the restructuring and insolvency market. Praised for his technical acumen, he regularly acts for lenders and insolvency practitioners.

Expertise: ‘Has a highly collaborative approach to his work; he is flexible, responsive and a pleasure to work with.’ ‘He has a fantastic legal brain, and displays excellent attention to detail and sound judgment.'”

Chambers UK Bar Guide 2013 stated:

“The ‘incredibly user-friendly’ Joseph Curl… a corporate and individual insolvency specialist who is described as ‘good news – he has buckets of enthusiasm, is quick with his paperwork and effective in all he does.'”

Chambers UK Bar Guide 2012 stated:

“Joseph Curl ‘is calm under pressure and has an excellent eye for detail.’ He is ‘able to understand complex issues with little effort and spots the commercial angle quickly.'”

Chambers UK Bar Guide 2011 commented that he:

“is commended for his ‘technical excellence’. He is ‘very thorough and quick to respond.'”

Joseph was one of four barristers identified by name in the Premonition UK High Courts Report 2017 (a “big data” survey of the English High Court extending to 11,193 cases over three years) in its analysis of litigation in the Chancery Division: see p.11.  View Report

Between 2001 and 2007, Joseph worked full-time in the insolvency department of DLA Piper UK LLP.

Recent reported cases

Davey v Money; Dunbar Assets plc v Davey
[2018] EWHC 766, [2018] All ER (D) 40 (Apr)

Three-sided five week trial before Snowden J involving complex allegations of breach of administrators’ duties and conspiracy by a lender. Joseph (led by Tom Smith QC) acted for the successful lender.

Frosdick v Fox
[2017] EWHC 1737 (Ch), [2018] 1 WLR 38, [2017] BPIR 1194

Birss J struck out a bankrupt’s claim on the application of Joseph’s client trustee, agreeing with the trustee that a bankrupt has no standing under s.316 to require his trustee to elect to disclaim or affirm.

Re PV Solar Limited Solutions Limited (in liquidation)
[2017] EWHC 3228 (Ch),  [2018] 1 BCLC 58, [2017] All ER (D) 90 (Dec)

Joseph represented the liquidators at trial in successfully impugning as misfeasance several payments made into a purported EFRBS tax avoidance arrangement at a time when the company was of doubtful solvency.

Re DP Holding SA; Hellard v Chen
[2017] BPIR 687, [2017] All ER (D) 21 (Mar)

The court examined the responsibilities of a BVI liquidator when seeking assistance from the English court pursuant to s.426.

Gaind v Dunbar Assets plc
[2016] EWHC 3187 (Ch), [2017] BPIR 667

The court rejected a borrower’s contention that a personal guarantee had been procured by misrepresentation. Joseph represented the successful lender at first instance and on appeal.

Re D’Eye (a bankrupt)
[2018] BPIR 411, [2017] BPIR 1174, [2017] BPIR 598, [2016] BPIR 883

Three trials against various associates of a bankrupt. Joseph represented the trustees in bankruptcy, whose claims to recover the remoter proceeds of void post-petition payments succeeded in full.

Harvey v Dunbar Assets plc
[2017] EWCA Civ 60, [2017] Bus LR 784, [2017] BPIR 450 (Court of Appeal)
[2015] EWHC 3355 (Ch), [2015] Bus LR 1383, [2016] BPIR 48 (Chancery Division) View decision

A debtor was estopped from challenging a statutory demand using an argument that had failed in earlier proceedings on a different statutory demand for the same debt. Joseph represented the successful lender.

Re Longmeade Ltd (in liquidation)
[2016] EWHC 356 (Ch), [2017] 2 All ER 244, [2017] 1 BCLC 605, [2016] Bus LR 506, [2016] BPIR 666 View decision

Joseph represented the liquidator of a Lehman entity in a claim against the Official Receiver. Snowden J ruled that liquidators may discount the views of creditors who are influenced by extraneous considerations.

In re Cooke (a bankrupt)
[2016] EWHC 1888 (Ch), [2016] Bus LR 960, [2016] Costs LR 781, [2016] BPIR 1339

The only reported case on the costs of an unsuccessful appeal against a bankruptcy order. Joseph successfully showed that such costs may take effect as a post-bankruptcy debt.

Re Cre8atsea Limited (in liquidation)
[2016] EWHC 2522 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 149 (Oct)

Joseph represented the successful petitioner in resisting an application to rescind a winding-up order.

Cooke v Dunbar Assets plc
[2016] EWHC 579 (Ch), [2016] BPIR 576, [2016] All ER (D) 49 (Apr)

Appeal from a bankruptcy order on the basis that an offer to compound had been unreasonably refused. Joseph represented the successful petitioner both at first instance and on appeal.

See More...See Less...

Baker and another v LSREF III Wight Ltd
[2016] BPIR 509, [2016] All ER (D) 254 (Feb)

Application establishing that a triable issue arose in respect of an allegation that a bank had rendered itself a fiduciary for its borrowers.

Rowbury v Official Receiver
[2015] EWHC 2276 (Ch), [2016] BPIR 477, [2016] BPIR 500, [2015] All ER (D) 129 (Sep)

Examined when failure to adjourn a creditors’ meeting to consider an individual voluntary arrangement will be a material irregularity. Joseph represented the successful dissentient creditors.

Ridsdale v Bowles
[2015] BPIR 1275

A bankrupt applied for annulment, alleging that the petition was abusive because a third party had paid the petitioner to procure the bankruptcy. Joseph represented the trustees in bankruptcy.

Dunbar Assets plc v Butler
[2015] EWHC 2546 (Ch), [2015] BPIR 1358, [2015] All ER (D) 138 (Sep)

Joseph represented the successful appellant lender. It was held that a triable issue of fact is insufficient to set aside a statutory demand: the issue must also disclose a defence.

Sands v Singh and others
[2015] EWHC 2219 (Ch), [2015] BPIR 1293, [2015] All ER (D) 304 (Jun) View decision

Addressed the effect of section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986 (the “use it or lose it provision”) where an application was not issued within the three year time limit.

Stella v Harris
[2014] EWHC 4492 (Ch), [2015] BPIR 926

Considered whether to grant permission to continue proceedings despite the existence of an interim order to facilitate an IVA proposal.

Ace Paper Ltd v Fry and others[2015] EWHC 1647 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 192 (Jul) View decision

Joseph represented the successful asset-based lender both at first instance and on appeal.  The court concluded that a contested book debt remained the property of Joseph’s client by applying “business common sense” to the contract.

Re Mark Irwin Forstater
[2015] BPIR 21

A proposal for an individual voluntary arrangement was deemed rejected where the creditors’ meeting was improperly suspended. Joseph represented the successful petitioning creditor.

Relfo Ltd (in liquidation) v Varsani
[2014] EWCA Civ 360, [2015] 1 BCLC 14 View decision

Joseph (led by Peter Shaw) represented the successful respondent to this appeal concerning laundering, tracing, knowing receipt and unjust enrichment. Arden LJ held that money substitutions may be traced in equity even where they do not occur in chronological order.

Hellard and Wade (trustees of Mireskandari) v (1) Chadwick (trustee of Tehrani) (2) Jami Tehrani
[2014] BPIR 163 (first instance)
[2014] EWHC 2158 (Ch), [2014] BPIR 1234 (appeal)

Trustees in bankruptcy commenced transaction at undervalue proceedings against another bankruptcy estate. Joseph successfully persuaded the court at first instance and on appeal that the claim constituted a debt provable in the respondent estate and should be stayed.

Bramston v Riaz
[2014] BPIR 42

A rare reported use of s.342(1)(b) of the Insolvency Act 1986. The court declared that assets represented “the application” of a transaction at an undervalue and ordered that they be vested in a trustee in bankruptcy without further order. Joseph represented the successful trustee.

Credit Lucky Ltd v National Crime Agency
[2014] EWHC 83 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 235 (Jan) View decision

The director of a money transfer company believed to have been used by organised criminals to launder the proceeds of crime to China applied to rescind a winding up order. Barling J dismissed the application. Joseph represented the company’s liquidator.

Re Harvest Finance Limited (in liquidation)
[2013] BPIR 1020

Detailed consideration of the jurisdiction to order disclosure against a company’s former solicitors under sections 234 and 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986 in circumstances where a strong prima facie case of fraudulent conduct is established. Joseph represented the successful liquidators.

Hellard v Kapoor
[2013] EWHC 2204 (Ch), [2013] EWHC 2496 (Ch), [2013] BPIR 745 View decision

Joseph represented the successful trustee in bankruptcy in this fiercely contested application to suspend discharge, which raised complex issues concerning purported family trusts. Indemnity costs were awarded to Joseph’s client.

Arif v Anwar
[2013] EWHC 624 (Fam), [2013] BPIR 389 View decision

The applicant wife challenged as shams trust arrangements between the husband and his son. Joseph successfully resisted an attempt by the husband and son (each separately represented by leading counsel) to exclude the husband’s trustee in bankruptcy from the proceedings.

Allen and another (joint liquidators of Rhinowheels Ltd) v Cowham
[2013] EWHC 1319 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 223 (May)

Freezing injunction in support of director’s misfeasance and transaction at undervalue proceedings. Joseph represented the successful liquidators.

Harvey v Dunbar Assets plc
[2012] EWHC 2890 (Ch), [2013] BPIR 66 (Chancery Division)
[2013] EWCA Civ 952, [2013] BPIR 722 (Court of Appeal)

Joseph (acting as sole counsel) successfully resisted a first appeal to the Chancery Division, where it was held that a personal guarantee could be enforced despite an allegation that a co-guarantor’s signature was forged. Joseph was led by Peter Arden QC on a second appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Dunbar Assets plc v Fowler
[2013] BPIR 46

A personal guarantor opposed a bankruptcy petition and argued that there was no petitionable debt. Joseph represented the successful lender. It is the only reported case on r.6.12(7) of the Insolvency Rules 1986 concerning delay between demand and petition.

Relfo Limited (in liquidation) v Varsani
[2010] EWCA Civ 560, [2011] 1 WLR 1402, [2010] 3 All ER 1045, [2011] 1 BCLC 71 View decision

The leading authority on the meaning of “usual or last known residence” for the purposes of service. Joseph was led by Guy Newey QC (now Mr Justice Newey) at first instance ([2009] EWHC 2297 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 30 (Oct)) and by Peter Shaw in the Court of Appeal.

R (Coke-Wallis) v Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
[2011] UKSC 1, [2011] 2 AC 146, [2011] 2 WLR 103, [2011] 2 All ER 1 View decision

Joseph addressed oral argument to the Supreme Court (reported at [2011] 2 AC 146, 149B-E, 150E-F) on each of the points on which the appeal was allowed, opposed by Michael Beloff QC for the respondent. The Supreme Court unanimously held that fresh disciplinary proceedings were res judicata and allowed Joseph’s client’s appeal.

(1) Haig (2) Shires (3) Lewis (4) Platinum Developers Ltd (in administration) v Beasant
LTL 6/8/2010

Application by receivers for a declaration that a director had no beneficial interest in a lease granted prior to a company’s insolvent administration. Joseph acted for the successful administrators.

Hooper (trustee in bankruptcy of Chowdhary) v Duncan Lewis (Solicitors) Limited
[2010] BPIR 591

Trustee in bankruptcy’s application for disclosure against third parties. Addressed legal professional privilege and third party disclosure under the insolvency regime.

Parkinson Engineering Services PLC (in liquidation) v Swan
[2009] EWCA Civ 1366, [2010] Bus LR 857, [2010] BPIR 437, [2010] 1 BCLC 163 View decision

Court of Appeal decision (led by Peter Shaw) concerning amendment of a negligence claim against administrators after expiry of limitation.

New v Gromore Limited
[2009] EWHC 2807 (Ch), [2010] 1 P & CR D50, [2009] All ER (D) 81 (Nov) View decision

Trespass to land and wrongful interference claim arising from the unauthorised demolition of a sculptor’s premises containing valuable works of art.

Penfold v Fuller
[2009] EWHC 1195 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 312 (Oct) View decision

Determined the correct interpretation of “the claimant” for the purposes of the Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008 and CPR rule 3.7.

Selected publications

Tackling Laundering: the implications of Relfo Limited (in liquidation) v Varsani
International Corporate Rescue 2015, 12(3), 156-161

TOUSA: Reckless Restructuring
Corporate Rescue and Insolvency 2013, 6(1), 15

Bankrupting personal guarantors: recent developments
Insolvency Intelligence 2012, 25(2), 17-22

Challenging the trustee’s remuneration: a new right for bankrupts?
Insolvency Intelligence 2011, 24(1), 5-10

The Spouse v the Creditors: A Turn Against Creditors?
Insolvency Intelligence 2010, 23(6), 81-87

“Use it or lose it”: section 283A after Lewis v Metropolitan
Insolvency Intelligence 2010, 23(5), 74-76

A purposive approach to the rule against foreign revenue enforcement
International Corporate Rescue 2010, 7(2), 137-139

Who can apply to rescind a winding-up order?
Insolvency Intelligence 2009, 22(10), 145-147

Professional memberships

Chancery Bar Association
Insolvency Lawyers Association
Proceeds of Crime Lawyers Association


LLB (1st Class Honours) (London) – Law – 2006
BA (1st Class Honours) (London) – Politics, Philosophy & History – 2003

Scholarships and Prizes

Wolfson Pupillage Scholarship – Lincoln’s Inn 2007
Lord Denning Major Scholarship – Lincoln’s Inn 2006
Hardwicke Entrance Scholarship – Lincoln’s Inn 2005
Cavendish Prize for Best Law Degree – Birkbeck, University of London 2006
Helena Kennedy Prize for Best Dissertation – Birkbeck, University of London 2006
Wildy’s Bookshop Prize for Tort – Birkbeck, University of London 2005
Pearson Publication Prize for Contract – Birkbeck, University of London 2004
Ede & Ravenscroft Prize – Birkbeck, University of London 2002

Joseph Curl is an independent self-employed barrister registered with the Bar Standards Board of England (ref. no 51595); whose practice is governed by the Code of Conduct of the Bar of England and Wales which code can be found at; has full professional liability insurance provided by the Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Limited (ref BM 2930/056) (details of the world-wide cover are provided at; is registered for VAT (reg. no. 938 9512 78); and can be contacted during chambers opening hours by telephone at 02074045055 or by e-mail at

9 Stone Buildings is committed to safeguarding your privacy. 9 Stone Buildings collects, uses and is responsible for personal information about you. Please read our privacy policy carefully in order to understand how your information will be treated. It also explains your rights in relation to your personal data and how to contact us.